Commitment Issues: Why Supporting Diverse Managers May Require Us to Rethink the GP Commit


Commitment Issues: Why Supporting Diverse Managers May Require Us to Rethink the GP Commit

by Jessie Gabriel, NAA General Counsel & All Places CEO

Many of us continue to be disappointed by the low percentage of assets going to diverse fund managers. According to the most recent Knight Foundation study, of the $82 trillion dollars of assets being managed in this industry, a quite pathetic 1.4% of those funds are controlled by asset managers owned by women or people of color (versus the 65% of the U.S. population made up by those same women and people of color). And we all know this disparity is not tied to success rates, interest levels, or inherent ability (we do all know that by now, right?).

At the same time, there are an increasing number of allocators out there expressing a desire to invest with diverse managers. What accounts for this mismatch between expressed desire and actual invested dollars? One of the reasons allocators give is that there aren’t enough diverse-owned funds that meet their diligence requirements. Okay. So maybe it’s time to revisit those requirements. Let’s start with the GP commit.

The GP commit is a regular guest on allocator diligence checklists. For new fund managers, the principals are expected to commit between 1-2% of the fund’s total AUM. Let’s use a modest fund of $100 million with two GPs to illustrate. This means that, in order to check this box, each of those individuals needs to be sitting on personal wealth of between $500,000 and $1,000,000. This is on top of the living expenses these individuals will be incurring during the year-long (let’s be conservative) fundraising process when they will be working full-time with no income. Obviously, this burden is even greater for single GPs.

As a result, the GP commit requirement effectively excludes anyone who is not already wealthy. Given how wealth concentration works in this country . . . you can see where I’m going with this. The GP commit is a factor that, while neutral on its face, effectively reinforces the inequity in this industry. I’m also going to give a shout-out here to all the single mothers raising and running funds. We need you here! And the GP commit is brutal if you are the sole breadwinner trying to raise a family with no current income.

So why does the GP commit requirement exist? There are good reasons. If you are investing your money with a manager you want to know that manager believes in herself at least as much as you do. If she’s confident her strategy will be profitable, she would want to invest her own money in it, right? That investment will also motivate her to perform (the so-called “skin in the game” rationale). These are both fair. However, are there other ways to demonstrate a manager believes in her strategy and is committed to its success? Certainly.

For one thing, if a manager has chosen to devote all of his time to raising and then running an investment fund, where he is paid nothing for at least a year, then paid a conservative salary (that is a fraction of what he could be making at someone else’s fund), and the majority of his compensation comes in the form of a percentage of profits, you could argue this is pretty strong evidence he believes in the strategy and is motivated for it to succeed. Now, this may not be the case at a very large fund where the manager is receiving hefty management fees regardless of performance and may have factored in a significant salary for himself. But that is not the case with emerging funds, where management fees and salaries are low. In other words, this feels like a big fund requirement that is applied to (and effectively excludes) smaller funds that are not run by people who are already rich.

Still not ready to ditch the GP commit requirement altogether? Then how about providing more context and flexibility? With context, you can’t tell me that a $2,000,000 commitment from two GPs with trust funds is necessarily greater proof of commitment to the fund’s success than a $200,000 commitment from a self-made single mother. With flexibility, allocators can consider reducing the GP commit or allowing managers to make their commitment by the end of the investment period (rather than pro rata with the other LPs).

If you really want to change the status quo, you need to reevaluate the structure that has supported it. Look at your diligence checklist and, for every box that may exclude diverse managers, ask: is this necessary, or is there another way we can achieve the same result? Start with the GP commit.

To contact: All-Places

Showing 10 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Reyaaz Seo
    commented 2024-02-23 22:23:16 -0800
  • Reyaaz Seo
    commented 2024-02-21 21:55:51 -0800
    Thank you for your insightful exploration into how the venture capital sector can better support diversity among fund managers. Your call for a reevaluation of traditional funding structures is both thought-provoking and necessary. It’s clear that creating a more inclusive environment requires significant changes, and your article is a crucial step in sparking that conversation. Great work!

    Reyaaz from Stylorize- https://stylorize.com/category/fashion/
  • Houston Jackets
    commented 2024-02-10 06:49:30 -0800
    Thanks for being so informative about your topic. Loved every part of it. I think one of the best jackets to wear in this cold has to be this.
  • Houston Jackets
    commented 2024-02-10 06:48:51 -0800
    Thanks for being so informative about your topic. Loved every part of it. I think one of the best jackets to wear in this cold has to be this. <a href=“”https://www.houstonjackets.com/product/taylor-swift-chiefs-bills-varsity-jacket/" rel="nofollow">https://www.houstonjackets.com/product/taylor-swift-chiefs-bills-varsity-jacket/">Taylor Swift Chiefs Jacket</a>
  • Mir Mir
    commented 2024-02-08 01:16:39 -0800
    Descoperă combinația perfectă între relaxare și potențial de câștig la rotiri fara depunere – https://slotsmegacasino.ro/free-spins-in-casino în cazinourile din România! Bucură-te de jocuri captivante și câștigă bani fără stres pentru mașina visurilor tale. Alătură-te nouă azi pentru o experiență de joc fără griji! 💰🎰 #rotirifaradepunere
  • John Clark
    commented 2023-09-20 01:13:03 -0700
    I’ve always loved Cowboy Bebop John Cho Suit https://www.leatherjacketz.com/product/cowboy-bebop-john-cho-suit/ elevates it to a whole new level." It’s sleek, modern, and has that futuristic flare that works nicely with the series. Congratulations to the costume designers!
  • jennifer browns
    commented 2023-09-05 07:45:38 -0700
    I truly appreciate this topic because I have read here exactly what I wanted. And I will also give a fashion tip to try this Yellowstone Livestock Agent Vest https://www.paragonjackets.com/product/yellowstone-livestock-agent-vest/ because it is amazing to wear.
  • Ophelia Watson
    commented 2023-09-03 06:46:50 -0700
    It’s great that you offer ideas for changes to this approach to provide more flexibility and context in assessing managers’ commitment to the success of the fund.
    Having ordered customised project writing help from experienced https://www.dnpcapstoneproject.com/ nursing professionals, I believe it was an important achievement for educational and professional purposes. I was satisfied and got a good result.
  • Maxim Kvilton
    commented 2023-06-18 08:58:57 -0700
    The online service for academic ghostwriting has exceeded my expectations in terms of customization and quality. They truly focus on my needs and work diligently to deliver a personalized service. The writers pay close attention to my specific requirements, resulting in papers that perfectly align with my expectations. I appreciate their dedication to assigning subject-related writers who can imitate my writing style seamlessly. This level of customization ensures that the ghostwritten content seamlessly integrates with my own work. The expertise of the ghostwriters is evident in their impeccable understanding of academic standards. They https://www.academicghostwriter.org/ employ progressive research methods and perform accurate calculations, utilizing only credible data sources. This guarantees the credibility and reliability of the papers they deliver. Theghost writer article also takes quality control seriously, with double proofreading, formatting, and originality score checking. The free revision period allows me to request any necessary adjustments to further enhance the quality. Overall, this service provides tailored ghostwriting assistance of the highest quality, making it an excellent choice for confidential academic help.
  • Jodi Towner
    published this page in News 2022-05-02 13:24:38 -0700